In his opening remarks, Joe Biden said “climate change is the greatest global challenge of our generation.” The comments come as a welcome relief to environmentalists who have been disappointed by Trump’s decision not to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement.
The “climate summit 2021” is a meeting that will be held in December of 2020. The United States Vice President Joe Biden will address the summit.
Image
On Monday, outside the main entrance of the COP26 meeting in Glasgow. Credit… The New York Times’ Kieran Dodds
The global climate conference in Glasgow started on Monday with a succession of statements that amounted to urgent calls for action from governments great and small, as mankind struggles to deal with rising oceans, more intense storms, deadly heat waves, and fast altering ecosystems required to support life.
With leaders from more than 120 nations gathering for the COP26 meeting, UN Secretary General António Guterres stressed the seriousness of the situation, saying that the impacts of global warming could be felt “from the ocean depths to the mountaintops.”
“Sea level rise has more than doubled in the last 30 years,” he claimed. Oceans are hotter than they’ve ever been, portions of the Amazon rain forest produce more carbon than they absorb, and climate change has impacted almost four billion people in the past decade.
Mr. Guterres said, “Enough of burning, drilling, and mining our way deeper.” “We’re burying ourselves in our own graves.”
The goal of the meeting is to keep the average global temperature from increasing more than 1.5 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial levels. That is the point at which experts believe the risks of global warming, such as severe heat waves, water shortages, crop failures, and ecosystem collapse, increase dramatically.
Mr. Guterres, on the other hand, called the notion that mankind is making enough progress “an illusion.” He urged nations to use the summit as a chance to spur one another on “until sticking to 1.5 degrees is ensured, until fossil fuel subsidies stop, until there is a price on carbon, and until coal is phased out,” rather than revisiting their climate commitments every year.
Many nations would oppose such sanctions, and the absence of Russian and Chinese leaders from the conference casts question on how unified the globe can be in the fight.
President Biden, who arrived in Washington from Rome on Monday and will speak to the group later that afternoon, has been harshly critical of both China and Russia.
China, the world’s greatest producer of greenhouse gases, announced a new emissions goal that is almost identical to one it set six years ago. The United States, the world’s greatest emitter in history, has set a lofty emissions target but has yet to implement legislation to meet it. Furthermore, Australia, India, and Russia have made no new commitments to reduce climate pollution this decade.
Meanwhile, only a few affluent countries have set aside funds to assist poor and vulnerable countries in coping with the repercussions of climatic calamities that they had no role in causing.
Because of these two considerations, the meeting, dubbed COP26, has a little chance of succeeding.
Even as he recognized the obstacles ahead, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson launched the summit with an urgent demand for action, comparing climate change to a bomb poised to burst.
He stated, “The sadness is that this isn’t a movie and the doomsday weapon is real.” “The clock on climate change has been ticking for a long time. On that doomsday clock, it’s one minute to midnight, and we need to act immediately.”
Barbados’ Prime Minister, Mia Mottley, has highlighted flaws in certain nations’ climate commitments, which are predicated on technology that do not yet exist.
“This is at best careless, and at worst deadly,” she remarked.
In September, a building site for a gas-fired power plant in Dongguan, China. Gilles Sabrié of The New York Times contributed to this article.
On Monday, as the US president flew to Glasgow for the climate meeting, the Biden administration increased its criticism of China, urging the Chinese to improve their emissions-cutting aspirations.
The criticism aimed to depict China and its leader, Xi Jinping, as large-economy laggards in the struggle to curb rising temperatures. Xi Jinping is noticeably missing from COP26. It was also intended to deflect attention away from America’s domestic challenges in fighting for pollution reductions.
President Biden’s national security advisor, Jake Sullivan, briefed reporters on Air Force One, calling the Chinese “major outliers” among nations that have made promises to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. China, according to Mr. Sullivan, “has a duty to rise up to greater ambition as we go ahead.”
When asked how the sour US-China relationship was harming global climate discussions, Mr. Sullivan blamed Beijing, calling its climate policies “very unequal.”
“Despite our challenges with China, the United States is moving forward,” Mr. Sullivan said. “By 2030, we want to reduce emissions by 50 to 52 percent. We’re delivering on all of our promises, and we’re holding up our half of the deal at COP.”
He went on to say that China is “a huge nation with a lot of resources and a lot of skills,” and that it is “absolutely capable of living up to its duties.”
Diplomats from some of the world’s most vulnerable nations have refrained from condemning China outright. Many diplomats replied merely that all Group of 20 countries must be more ambitious when questioned about Beijing’s new aim, which is basically indistinguishable from its 2015 objective of peaking emissions before 2030.
Tina Stege, a Marshall Islands climate ambassador, stated in a statement, “The world needs more.” “China, as well as other G20 nations, can and should do more.”
According to Alf Wills, a former South African top negotiator, developing countries are hesitant to openly criticize China for a variety of reasons. For example, Chinese diplomats may play an important role in pressuring wealthier governments to provide aid to developing countries. For another thing, China currently outpaces the US in terms of giving help to poor countries.
“From an economic standpoint, China is very much an economic giant,” Mr. Wills said, “especially among developing nations.”
On Sunday, President Biden spoke at the close of the Group of 20 conference in Rome. Credit… The New York Times/Erin Schaff
President Biden will attempt to persuade a meeting of global leaders in Glasgow that the United States, which has spewed more greenhouse emissions into the atmosphere than any other country, is now serious about tackling climate change and that others should follow suit.
Mr. Biden, on the other hand, is bringing a weaker hand than he had intended.
He has been compelled to forgo the most potent mechanism in his climate agenda: a scheme that would have cleaned up the electrical industry swiftly by paying corporations that moved away from fossil fuels and penalized those that did not. A package that would give $555 billion in renewable energy tax credits and incentives is his backup approach. It would be the most money ever spent by the US to combat global warming, yet it would only reduce emissions by approximately half.
And that idea is currently on hold; Mr. Biden was unable to forge an agreement with progressives and moderates in his own party before departing for Glasgow. He plans to link the bill with new environmental restrictions if it succeeds, but such regulations have yet to be drafted and may be undone by a future president.
Diplomats and other leaders praised Mr. Biden for making climate action a core theme of his administration, expressing relief when President Donald J. Trump dismissed climate science and pulled the US from global efforts to solve the situation.
They are dubious, though, since previous American presidents have promised bold action on climate change only to fall short.
Last month, steam from cooling towers at a nuclear power facility in France. Credit… Reuters/Benoit Tessier
BRUSSELS, BELGIAN REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN REPU The European Union’s 27 member nations, representing roughly 450 million people, arrive in Glasgow with a smug sense of accomplishment, having pledged to a major reduction in carbon emissions.
In July, the European Union unveiled one of the most ambitious and comprehensive plans in the world to transition to a carbon-neutral economy by 2050. Brussels has promised to lowering greenhouse gas emissions by 55 percent by 2030, compared to 1990 levels, in order to drive the issue.
However, inside the bloc, there are difficult and contentious disputes over how to accomplish such a decrease and what counts as “green” enough to get subsidies. Nuclear energy qualifies for several major, significant nations like France and Poland, both to sustain existing infrastructure and to reduce conventional coal reliance.
By 2030, 38.5 percent of total energy must come from renewable sources, according to the guidelines.
Others are ready to soften measures to ban the sale of new gas and diesel automobiles, including hybrids, in only 14 years.
The plan’s centerpiece, though, is to raise the price of carbon emissions from practically every sector of the economy, impacting items like building cement and cruise ship gasoline.
There’s also a dispute over whether and how much carbon taxes should be imposed on imports, a so-called carbon border tax, so that European industries don’t lose out to items made in less environmentally conscious nations. There have also been promises made regarding a fund that would be funded by increased carbon fees and potentially offer up to 70 billion euros (about $81 billion) to help governments assist the most vulnerable individuals.
While divisive, the European Commission’s recommendations represent an attempt by the bloc’s executive arm to exert worldwide leadership in the global drive to decrease emissions. European firms also want to develop technology breakthroughs that they may offer to other nations.
Despite producing just around 8% of current global carbon emissions, the European Union’s cumulative emissions since the dawn of the industrial era are among the highest in the world. However, as a large market, it views itself as a worldwide regulatory force, hoping to set an example, develop new technology to sell, and establish global norms that would lead to a carbon-free economy.
In a statement regarding the Glasgow meeting, David Sassoli, the president of the European Parliament, which must approve any final accord, stated, “We cannot afford for it to fail.”
“The existing national plans to confront climate change are nowhere near adequate,” he said, citing a recent United Nations assessment on emissions.
“Nice intentions must become clear and feasible policies if we are serious about limiting a rise of more than 1.5 degrees,” he added.
“Enough with the burning, drilling, and mining our way deeper,” UN Secretary-General António Guterres said at a meeting in Glasgow on Monday. Credit… Associated Press/Alberto Pezzali
On Monday, UN Secretary-General António Guterres released a harsh indictment of the world’s inability to curb global warming, urging nations to reassess their climate objectives every year rather than every five years, as the Paris climate accord specifies.
“We are still careening towards climate disaster, even if the latest commitments were clear and genuine — and there are major uncertainties about some of them,” he remarked during the opening ceremony of COP26, the United Nations climate meeting in Glasgow.
Mr. Guterres said, “Our world is speaking to us.” “We must both listen and act.”
He was referring to studies that show that even if all nations fulfill their national carbon reduction objectives, the global average temperature would climb 2.7 degrees Celsius by the end of the century, compared to pre-industrial times. As a result, the planet will experience more extreme heat, flames, and floods.
Scientists have found that limiting temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius is the best strategy to avoid the worst effects of climate change.
Mr. Guterres’ request for annual assessments is being pushed by a group of nations most susceptible to climate change, but it is anticipated to be met with strong opposition from many governments, who will claim that it rewrites the 2015 Paris Agreement’s goals.
These yearly evaluations, according to Mr. Guterres, should continue until the globe as a whole achieves the 1.5-degree objective. He also increased the stakes with specific demands, such as the elimination of fossil fuel subsidies, the imposition of a carbon tax, and the phase-out of coal.
None of this has been agreed upon by the world’s largest polluters. Even as recently as Sunday, leaders of the Group of 20 affluent nations — headed by the United States, China, and European Union countries — departed from a conference in Rome with little more than a commitment to stop subsidizing coal from abroad.
As COP26 arrived in Glasgow on Sunday, David Attenborough attended the premiere of “Green Planet.” Credit… Associated Press/Jane Barlow/Press Association
One of Britain’s most recognized public personalities and one of the world’s most famous advocates for Earth’s natural beauty, David Attenborough, urged leaders to utilize the COP26 meeting as a climate turning point, resulting in a more fair society.
On Monday, among global leaders and climate campaigners, the naturalist, whose narrative gravity has focused attention on the planet’s health for decades, was one of the first speakers at the meeting.
“If working alone we can destabilize our world, certainly working together we can preserve it,” said Mr. Attenborough, 95.
With his kind yet powerful voice, Mr. Attenborough has brought viewers to the most beautiful corners of the earth in his wildlife programs. However, his work has never shied away from controversial environmental problems, and he often talks openly about the high risks of climate change and the actions required to solve it.
On Monday, he concentrated his comments on carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, a metric he claims “defines our connection with our world.” He claims that once the population stabilized in the previous 10,000 years, civilisation became viable, and people took advantage of it.
However, he cautioned that this stability was now in jeopardy.
“Perhaps the reality that the individuals most impacted by climate change are young people living now, rather than some imagined future generation,” he added, “will give us the motivation we need to rewrite our narrative.”
Video
transcript
Back
transcript
Ahead of the COP26 Summit, Prince Charles calls for action on climate change.
Prince Charles, speaking to global leaders at the Group of 20 summit in Rome, referred to the COP26 climate conference in Glasgow as “the last-chance saloon” for preventing climate change’s worst consequences.
Respectfully, ladies and gentlemen, Tomorrow is the start of COP26 in Glasgow. It’s the last chance saloon, to put it bluntly. Now we must turn excellent words into even better deeds. And, as the magnitude of the climate challenge dominates people’s conversations from newsrooms to living rooms, and as humanity’s future in nature is at stake, it is surely time to put our differences aside and seize this once-in-a-generation opportunity to launch a significant green recovery by putting the global economy on a confident, sustainable path, thus saving our planet.
Prince Charles, speaking to global leaders at the Group of 20 summit in Rome, referred to the COP26 climate conference in Glasgow as “the last-chance saloon” for preventing climate change’s worst consequences. CreditCredit… Aaron Chown took this shot of the pool.
During his presentation to global leaders at the COP26 meeting on Monday, Prince Charles called for a “military-style effort” to battle climate change.
His words expanded on remarks he made in Rome, where he referred to the summit, which opened on Monday, as “the last-chance saloon” for averting the worst impacts of climate change.
“The future of mankind and nature herself is at risk,” said Charles, who is the heir to the British monarchy and is known as the Prince of Wales.
“It’s also hard not to hear the despondent cries of young people who perceive you, ladies and gentlemen, as the custodians of the earth, holding the viability of their future in your hands,” he told global leaders gathered in Rome on Sunday for the Group of 20 summit. He reminded them that they had a “overwhelming duty” to future generations.
He said that successfully tackling climate change will need “trillions of billions in annual investment to build the essential new infrastructure and fulfill the crucial 1.5-degree warming objective that would rescue our forests and farms, our seas, and our species.”
“I am now detecting a change of mindset and a buildup of good momentum,” he added, “after I believe about 50 years of working to raise awareness of the mounting climatic and environmental issue.”
The prince’s mother, Queen Elizabeth II, was supposed to attend the climate summit, but she will not since her doctors have urged her to rest.
Aerial image of a sliver of land in Tuvalu that runs along the Pacific Ocean. Credit… Getty Images/Mario Tama
Small island countries most hit by rising sea levels and storms are going to an international court, frustrated at being overlooked in the battle against climate change, in the hopes of obtaining compensation to replace losses and better defend themselves.
The Caribbean country of Antigua and Barbuda and the Pacific island of Tuvalu launched a case before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on Sunday, as the COP26 conference got underway, to seek damages from major polluting nations.
“While the leaders of major nations dither, litigation is the only way we will be taken seriously,” said Gaston Browne, the prime minister of Antigua and Barbuda and the head of the Alliance of Small Island States. “We want to put them in a position where they have to react in a court of law.”
“We are on the forefront of this struggle because we are on the frontline of enduring the devastating repercussions,” Mr. Browne said, adding that tiny island governments “did not create the challenges of climate change.”
There are no procedures for dispute resolution in the present climate agreements. The tribunal, which is situated in Hamburg, Germany, is charged with resolving disputes arising from the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which requires countries to safeguard the maritime environment. The convention has been ratified by a significant majority of countries, while the United States is one of the few that has not.
The tribunal has made decisions on seabed mining, maritime borders, and fisheries, but it has never considered a case about greenhouse gases and their consequences on the seas.
The islands will first question the justices of the tribunal if it is allowed to sue nations that create greenhouse gases that warm and affect the waters for damages. The islands are hoping that the judges will decide on whether excessive greenhouse gases are pollutants covered by the treaty, a result that may be game-changing since it might open the door to cases before the tribunal or other international tribunals.
A judgement like this, according to Payam Akhavan, a lawyer who represents both Antigua and Barbuda and Tuvalu, “might be a game-changer.” The polluter pays concept applies.”
Because two signatures are necessary to begin the procedure, the governments have banded together, but they anticipate more islands to join the legal attempt.
The changing climate poses a variety of issues to island nations across the globe. Rising oceans have eroded land and harmed crops and drinking water on low-lying atolls, mostly in the Pacific. Hurricanes have wreaked havoc on the Caribbean’s volcanic islands, causing infrastructural damage.
Mia Mottley, the prime minister of Barbados, warned that wealthier countries’ reluctance to act amounted to a “death sentence” for island nations like hers and most of the poor world, addressing at a global climate conference on Monday.
“Are we so hardened and blinded that we can’t hear the screams of humanity?” she wondered.
In September, US climate envoy John Kerry (second left) spoke before the United Nations General Assembly. On Sunday, he said, “It is vital that nations set out stronger climate strategies.” Credit… Getty Images/Brendan Smialowski/Agence France-Presse
John Kerry, the former secretary of state who helped seal the Paris climate deal in 2015 and is now President Biden’s climate envoy, comes on Monday with a carefully constructed message for the United Nations summit: It is vital, but not the final opportunity for action.
In a subsequent interview, he said, “Glasgow was never going to be the definitive one meeting.”
In contrast, Mr. Kerry said last month that the meeting represents “the last best chance” for reducing greenhouse gas emissions enough to avoid the worst effects of climate change.
The goal of the 26th session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or COP26, is to inspire world leaders to reduce global warming emissions to below 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. Sea level rise, depleted food output, and coral reef extinction become irrevocable at that time. It will be the first occasion since countries committed to reduce emissions in 2015 that leaders will be urged to raise their objectives in Glasgow.
The peak in Glasgow has a lot riding on it. Arriving passengers are greeted by a sign that reads, “The world is looking to you, COP26.”
“Where Paris promised, Glasgow must deliver,” Alok Sharma, the British politician who serves as the conference’s president, said during the event’s ceremonial start on Sunday.
However, leaders are well aware that this will not be the case. China, India, Russia, Australia, and Saudi Arabia have all announced limited or no new plans to reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuels in the next decade. And the United States, which has set an ambitious goal of halving emissions by 2030, has failed to adopt legislation that would assure that goal is met.
Mr. Kerry pointed out that when Mr. Biden assumed office, few nations had committed to goals that kept global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius. “We’ve pushed, cajoled, and bargained with innumerable countries,” he said, adding that countries accounting for around 65 percent of global economic production now have aggressive plans for the next decade.
Mr. Kerry said, “Glasgow was never going to have every nation signing up,” but added, “It was going to catalyze the raising of ambition on a global level, and the truth is that ambition will be much greater in Glasgow than at any time.”
Mr. Kerry said that he was already looking forward to next year in order to build on the commitments made by governments and encourage them to do more.
In a call with media on Sunday, Mr. Kerry added, “It is vital that governments set forth better strategies.” “We’re working hard to preserve the 1.5 degree target.”
On Monday, I arrived in Glasgow for the COP26 climate meeting. Credit… Associated Press/Alberto Pezzali
Organizing a global summit with leaders from over 100 countries and tens of thousands of delegates and activists, while also preparing for over 100,000 protestors to converge on the conference halls, would be a tremendous task at any time.
This isn’t the right moment. Officials at this year’s COP26 climate meeting, which has already been postponed a year due to the coronavirus, will be under pressure to address the risks presented by a warming globe even as the virus’s unseen menace looms.
And, just as climate change has already had some of the most severe effects on the world’s poorest countries, the inability to equally distribute lifesaving vaccinations has split the globe between those who are protected and those who are exposed.
Vaccine disparity is also affecting the meeting, with campaigners claiming that the concerns of some of the most vulnerable countries to climate change are not being heard.
Some delegates from impoverished countries were unable to attend, according to Dorothy Guerrero of the advocacy organization Global Justice Now, who told reporters last weekend that the unwillingness to allow additional manufacturers access to create the vaccinations was one of the reasons.
“You are already burdened by the reality that your nation has been damaged for decades, yet you are the least culpable for climate change,” she remarked during a press conference in Glasgow. “Yet you couldn’t come here and speak out at this crucial meeting just because you couldn’t get the vaccine.”
Britain has promised to assist any delegates who need a Covid-19 immunization, but they are not requiring inoculation. Instead, to get access to the conference facility, attendees must produce confirmation of a negative coronavirus test every day.
In 2018, a coal-fired power plant in Zouping, China. China, the world’s greatest fossil fuel user, has said that its emissions would peak “before 2030.” Credit… The New York Times’ Giulia Marchi
Many nations have pledged to do more to combat climate change, but their plans fall far short of what is required to avert disastrous global warming.
China, the United States, the European Union, and India are the world’s four largest polluters, accounting for little over half of global greenhouse gas emissions and are seen as critical to preventing future climate change consequences.
Based on data from Climate Action Tracker, these graphs depict emissions paths for the world’s top ten polluters. They show how emissions are expected to change under current climate policies through 2030, how much each country has pledged to reduce emissions, and what would be required to keep total global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, a goal that many leaders and scientists increasingly believe is necessary to avoid the worst effects of heat waves, droughts, wildfires, and flooding.
According to Climate Action Tracker, the world could restrict warming to around 2.4 degrees Celsius over preindustrial levels by 2100 if all nations follow through on their present near-term promises. However, many experts believe that this is still too dangerous.
To keep global warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius, the world’s governments would have to do a lot more, reducing their fossil fuel emissions in half during the next decade.
Here are some of the promises that have been made.
On Saturday, Greta Thunberg arrived at a railway station in Glasgow. Credit… Reuters/Dylan Martinez
Greta Thunberg’s arrival in Glasgow for the United Nations climate summit on Saturday rapidly devolved into mayhem, with scores of people mobbing the campaigner.
Ms. Thunberg, who is 18 years old, was not scheduled to speak at the 12-day summit, which began on Sunday, but she traveled to Glasgow by train regardless. She was one of several protestors who descended on the COP26 meeting to urge that global leaders take steps to prevent catastrophic climate change from occurring.
According to social media recordings, Ms. Thunberg was instantly encircled by a loud throng after walking out of a gate at Glasgow Central Station. Her solo climate strikes in 2018 helped ignite a worldwide youth climate movement.
According to the footage, she did not seem to talk to anybody who had encircled her after they welcomed her with a combination of applause and shouts. She kept her head down and followed the police officers taking her past the gathering, which looked to include photographers, young people, and one agitated guy.
“Exercise compassion. In one of the films, he tells a photographer, “You’re not entitled to her.”
“Give her some room,” another guy replied. This is not acceptable.”
In an interview last week, Ms. Thunberg said that she had not been “formally” asked to speak at the summit. She went on to say that she believed the summit organizers had not invited many young speakers because they were “afraid that inviting too many ‘radical’ young people would make them seem terrible,” she claimed, using air quotes.
Ms. Thunberg did not specify how long she intended to remain in Glasgow. On Friday, she was set to participate in a Fridays for Future climate strike in the city.
She descended an escalator at Glasgow railway station and pumped her fist in the air after leaving the majority of the throng behind her. She then offered a thumbs up to the assembled crowd.
Ms. Thunberg’s face was difficult to read under her mask, but she seemed to enjoy the welcome she received at the railway station. “Finally in Glasgow for the #COP26!” she tweeted on Saturday. Thank you also for the kind welcome.”
In October, Russian President Vladimir V. Putin spoke at an energy conference in Moscow and said that he would not attend the climate meeting in Glasgow. Credit… Shutterstock/EPA/Sergei Ilnitsky
When questioned about criticism of the world’s richest economies doing more to address climate change in Rome on Sunday, President Biden pointed out the absence of two significant players: China and Russia.
“Not just Russia, but China, in terms of any pledges to deal with climate change, essentially didn’t show up,” the president told reporters. “There’s a reason people are dissatisfied with it. “I was dissatisfied with it.”
The presidents of China and Russia were among the conspicuous no-shows when Mr. Biden joined more than 100 global leaders in Glasgow for a vital climate meeting a day later.
Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil and Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, together with Xi Jinping of China and Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, will not be attending the summit.
The participation of leaders of state and government in the discussions is not only symbolic. Leaders are able to do things that lower-level diplomats are unable to. President Barack Obama barged into a secret meeting with the presidents of China, India, Brazil, and South Africa at the 2009 climate conference in Copenhagen. The subsequent conversations aided in the conclusion of a settlement, although a shaky one.
As a result, several analysts are concerned about the high-profile absences this time.
“Even as most democracies make ambitious climate commitments, the world’s most powerful autocrats in Beijing, Moscow, and elsewhere are thumbing their noses, refusing to cut their emissions and even showing up at climate negotiations,” said Paul Bledsoe, a former Clinton White House climate adviser who now works for the Progressive Policy Institute.
Mr. Putin announced his absence from the meeting more than a week ago, citing worries about the coronavirus.
“Unfortunately, the president will not be able to speak since videoconferencing is not accessible in Glasgow,” said Dmitri S. Peskov, a Kremlin spokesperson.
In response to Mr. Biden’s remarks, Mr. Peskov said that Russia is “already ahead of many nations, including those in Western Europe,” in terms of shifting to low-carbon energy sources.
Mr. Putin, speaking by video to the Group of 20 meeting in Rome on Sunday, claimed that nuclear, renewables, and natural gas accounted for 86 percent of Russian energy consumption. While natural gas emits half the carbon dioxide that coal does, critics argue that it still produces pollution that contributes to global warming, and that its pipes are subject to methane leaks, a powerful greenhouse gas.
Mr. Bolsonaro, who has been chastised for his environmental policies, has not said why he is not present. He attended the G20 summit over the weekend, and instead of attending the climate conference, he is visiting an Italian town that hopes to bestow honorary citizenship on him.
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s president, who has committed to make fighting climate change a priority, was also due to fly to Glasgow following the G20 conference, but instead returned to Istanbul, according to the state-run Anadolu news agency. A procedural problem involving his group in Glasgow was the cause for his absence from the climate talks, according to an official. In his place, Turkey’s environment minister is set to attend the summit.
Mr. Xi is likely to address the Glasgow summit with a statement. Since the coronavirus spread from the Chinese city of Wuhan, he has not officially left China.
The “biden latest news” is the latest update on the COP26 summit. The event will be addressed by Vice President Joe Biden.
Related Tags
- leaders summit on climate
- biden speech today live
- leaders summit on climate youtube
- white house climate summit
- cspan climate summit
